Alan Manuel Gloria:
> Here's another question. I assume that { foo(bar(nitz)) } is (foo
> (bar nitz)), i.e. n-expressionism is recursive within curlies. How
> will we implement the reader?
Turns out it was a one-line change in our implementation. I've made the change
in the "develop" branch and pushed it out. It can probably be simplified
greatly, but let's first briefly try it out to make sure we want to do it.
Since from sweet-expressions we *already* use this functionality, I don't
foresee any problem.
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
