On 1/14/13, Alan Manuel Gloria <almkg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/11/13, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote: >> I said: >>> > 2. In an earlier email discussion we discussed how to interpret >>> > "(head|empty) DOLLAR comment_eol"; the current BNF production reflects >>> > that. However, I'm now leaning toward making that be an error. >> >> John Cowan: >>> I agree again. I think it's very important not to fall into the trap >>> of "Well, this syntax has no current meaning, but I see how it could >>> possibly mean X, so let's make it mean X." In such situations, I think >>> it is far better for the syntax in question to be an error. If every >>> possible syntax is meaningful, then there is no hope of intuitive error >>> detection, still less error correction, an important property of a truly >>> readable syntax. >> >> Yes indeed. >> >> I think unless Alan Manuel K. Gloria (or someone else) makes a strong >> case >> for keeping things as-is, "DOLLAR comment_eol" is going away. >> We should document this (and why) in the SRFI, whatever ends up >> happening. > > Not gonna (^^)v. As I originally conceived, DOLLAR is supposed to be used: > > foo $ bar nitz $ quux fobar > --> > (foo (bar nitz (quux fobar))) > > or even: > > define foo(bar) $ cond > { bar < 42 } $ begin > do-bar-less-than-42 bar > whatever > else $ begin > do-bar-greater-than-42 bar > whatnot > > I can't really conceive of a use of $ at the end of the line.
Oh, and maybe we should call it "SUBLIST" instead of "DOLLAR". (^^) Sincerely, AmkG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss