Alan Manuel Gloria <almkg...@gmail.com> > Why 0.9? Latest is 0.6, and the latest wiki modifications page is > Modifications-0.7. Modifications-0.7 mentions the new <* ... *> rules > already, so there doesn't seem to be a justifiable reason to skip 2 > numbers.
A fair question! We obviously have room for more numbers :-). But I don't know of any other proposed changes to the syntax or semantics of sweet-expressions; operators, meanings, etc. seem set. My intent is that this be the next-to-last version of the syntax before it's "official". We then go through the SRFI process, make whatever changes (if any) that surfaces, and then declare the results final, aka 1.0. Working backwards, the previous version would be 0.9.. But if you think we should call the next version 0.7, that's great by me. We can obviously skip from 0.7 to 1.0 if it's done :-). --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
