This sentence: "Some people require a second explanation of the simpler version of sublist (“$”), even though “$” is currently very simple."
Could probably be better expressed as: "Some people require a second explanation of SUBLIST, which is essentially the explanation of the *current* version of SUBLIST described in this SRFI." -- The sentence: "Adding this capability to “$” makes it much more complicated to describe." seems redundant, since we already said: "It complicates explanation of “$”" earlier. On 3/2/13, Alan Manuel Gloria <almkg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/1/13, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote: >> Alan Manuel Gloria: >> >>> Err I already wrote a draft section on Beni's proposal and pushed it >>> *very* early this morning. >> >> Got it. I took our versions and tried to merge them together. >> >> Please do take a look and fix any problems you see. >> > > Seems okay, although: > > "There’s already a body of material on how to handle indentation-based > languages, which tend to follow Python approaches and specifically do > NOT differentiate between “indent 3 spaces” and “indent 1 space”, just > INDENT." > > ...seems to come out of left field, given that the formal description > above it mentions just "INDENT" and "DEDENT". It may be better to > reword it to something nearer to: > > "...which tend to follow Python or Haskell approaches and specifically > consider the actual source stream to have matching indentations and > dedentations" > > ...or, er, something clearer, anyway. Erk. > > -- > > Otherwise seems fine, we need more links to archive mailinglist messages. > > Sincerely, > AmkG > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
