Alan Manuel Gloria: > SRFI-sweet says that implementations MAY have sweet-expressions > enabled by default. That actually argues for having a #!no-sweet, and > having #!curly-infix disable sweet expressions but retaining > curly-infix.
Okay, I've changed to spec to "SHOULD" that (but MUST accept them), and I changed the code to stub-implement that. The implementation accepts #!no-sweet and #!curly-infix but doesn't really change the semantics. I suspect there are scoping problems, which may not be so easily fixed in the sample implementation because we're stepping outside the Scheme standard (by trying to "set!" the read procedure). As a sample implementation it's fine though; a "real" implementation would embed this in "read", so the code as-is is a reasonable outline of how to handle it. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
