Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin <c...@users.sf.net> wrote: > > This is kinda late to say this, and I'm not at all sure it's an > > improvement. But the thought won't leave me, so better now than never... > > => What if we make a lone $ on a line serve as GROUP, making $ always > > "pro-list"?
I haven't seen any other comments on this, and I don't think it's an improvement. It complicates some things, eliminates a potential avenue for future extension (should that be useful), and interferes with some nice symmetries. I'll note that even the proposer isn't sure we should do this. So for the moment I (at least) don't plan to do this. If anyone has additional arguments for this, please post asap... BTW, I really appreciate Beni's willingness to post the idea now, while we can still reasonably discuss it. Thanks! --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
