Mark has just sent another e-mail on the SRFI-110 mailinglist: http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-110/mail-archive/msg00186.html
Basically, our options (I think....) are: 1. Drop ANTLR and use a simpler BNF. 2. Create a "simpler" third implementation that calls to an SRFI-105 implementation. Other things we could do, based on Mark's suggestions? On 6/5/13, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 19:40:26 +0800, Alan Manuel Gloria <almkg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Mark H Weaver (one of the Guile devs who is open to implementing our >> notation) complains that the ANTLR code is too complex. >> >> Is there anything we can do to make it simpler? > > Thanks for posting; I'd definitely like to hear others' thoughts. > I'm confident that we can make it simpler if we put our heads together. > > I'll probably be inactive for the next few days, due to > pressing work and visiting family. > > --- David A. Wheeler > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
