On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 7:37 PM, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com>wrote:
>
> foo5-body-only-comments
> ! #; hello
>
> I think this isn't new - same situation could happen with datum comment of
a neoteric expression:
foo5-body-only-comments
! #;hello
My current starting implementation produces this:
> (foo5-body-only-comments)
>
> ... and *NOT* the symbol "foo5-body-only-comments".
>
> IIUC, this also happens for datum comment of an n-expr, right?
Certainly both kinds of datum comments should behave similarly.
I think producing a list is good, per the general rule that datum comment
indentation is significant.
[
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-110/srfi-110.html#block-comment-indent-significant
]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
