On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:48:31 +0800, Alan Manuel Gloria <almkg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good, but I doubt "cycle back" is a good idea; suppose that the > user has a sequence like so: ,,, > So, I think it's best for the scope-narrowing key to *not* cycle, but > instead, will saturate to the narrowest possible. The narrowing then > gets canceled on a cursor-movement command (is that possible in > emacs?) or escape key.
Great point! I agree. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
