On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:17:18 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger"
        <joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net> wrote:
> When looking at set-read-mode I'm not sure it integrates well.
> 
> It claims that it should support per-port settings.  Does not know how 
> to do this and me neither.
> 
> However using parameters lends itself to per-port semantics.
> 
> All we'd have to export those parameters and get to per-port settings by 
> means of parameterize.
> 
> Ho about?

We really should support per-port settings.  I appreciate the
parameter patch, but making them parameters is kind of a workaround.

I find no officially-standard way to compare ports.
However, I'm guessing that in practice "eq?" should be able
to determine if two ports are the same or not.  If so,
we could create a hashtable of port => portsettings,
and then tweak your parameter patch to use that.

Anyone else have comments?

--- David A. Wheeler

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to