I don't know where you got that idea. The demo you sent me (saying you
didn't know what else to do to speed it up) was serving pages at about
1/30th of the speed of my pre-alpha webserver.
Perhaps you had mistaken one of the earlier test runs (of which I had even
sent you the source), but the pre-alpha that I released specifically to
proof my caims about its speed was unmatched and not based on the source I
had sent you.
Ronald Vogelaar
--
http://www.rovosoft.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Theodore H. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Investigation into string appending approaches in RB 2006
Yes, I need not be convinced.
But even if Join is faster in certain cases, you'd still only have a
string.
For Metropolis, "Join+Operator_Convert" would have to be faster than
FastString for me before I'd use it, and I don't have to test to know
that
is not the case.
Understand me well, I'm no ElfData advocate per se. I'm not using it
when it
doesn't make sense. Like my pre-alpha webserver that got everyone else's
beat didn't use ElfData because I could do it faster with pure RB.
I actually did do a web server demo for you, using my plugin that was
just as fast as your own, though.
I mostly used my plugin for the caching system, though. It turned out the
caching made little difference to speed, which I am not sure why. It did
make a positive difference, though, just not really worth it. I would
have expected it to make a huge difference.
--
http://elfdata.com/plugin/
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
