Stephanie:

I created several reports about the problems I'm having. When I saw that RB's response to others who have the same problems was simply send us a project, I started this thread. I understand all of the changes in the Mac world as we go through them as well. Like I said earlier, RB has to roll with them and so do we. My problem is total frustration because these problems, although much more well known than I thought, are falling on deaf ears. I'm not used to that from RB. So, sometimes screaming is what's left.

Mike
On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:41 PM, stephane richard wrote:

I completely agree with this initiative :-).

I think that, if done right, it will really help them give us the product we want. I think there's no point to yelling because as everyone has seen, it doesn't seem to go anywhere to tell them they suck. Because when you look at what they did give you, no one that sucks can give you this :-).

What's going now? Mac is going the Intel CPU way, which means there's a transitional phase (ever so small as it might be, it's still there) and that goes for all software makers.Maybe, the new Mac OS X needs to get things done differently to be as good as it seems to be which might involve some copying of resources internally which can cause the gain in size. Maybe the problem can be easily fixed, maybe we'll have to deal with them the way they are. I think it's too early to tell yet, definitaly too early to judge and decide anything. RealBasic users (and I'm sure other languages are going throught atleast some kind of phase with all these OS and hardware changes happening close to simultaneously. IF they are changing to Intel Based, some code needs to be adapted to the new CPU instruction set. you name it. There's just alot of things that seem to be happening in the Mac World these days. I'm sure it's all good, or will be in the end, but for now, I think this "transition" phase might be the bigger part of the problems being listed here.

And I definitaly think we should help them cope with this transition of hardware and software alike. Like Emile proposed, let's enumerate the issues, maybe even categorize them if we can. and if this list doesn't work, then email realsoft themselves directly once we have a good complete list of issues to talk about. And we'll see what happens afterwards. Who knows, maybe this way, things will change :-). I say it's worth a try since the other methods (as illustrated by the posts here, didn't yield many results). What do you say?

MystikShadows
Stephane Richard (Self Proclamed Peace Maker) hehe.




----- Original Message ----- From: "Emile Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 1:13 PM
Subject: Try to create a constructive list (Re: RB2006r1 VERY VERY Slow)


I am dreaming:

can we be a bit more constructive and put here and in the Feedback real facts about what bother us ?

I mean: avoid any "it is slow" or "it does not feet my needs".

Try with more details something like "my current project - description: plugins, Platform, Declare, used technologies... - weight xx.yyMB and is slow: n seconds to get the application running / n seconds to get the application created on disk"...


yes, I am dreaming eyes open some minutes before taking dinner...


Emile

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to