On Feb 19, 2006, at 2:42 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
Not seen Qt before. Looks interesting, though it is substantially more expensive than Rb.
While Qt has most of the power needed, its UI functionality leaves a lot to be desired. Marginally better than a Java app that is using Swing, or whatever, but nowhere near RB, and a loooong way from Interface Builder.
Looks OK on Windows though, but I'm probably less picky about Windows interfaces.
-- Troy RPSystems, Ltd. http://www.rpsystems.net _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
