[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: Please, put back Option-Up-Arrow and Option-Down-Arrow From: "Jonathan
Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:24:52 -0600 On 2/22/06, Thomas
Tempelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, do you mean that agree with this what I (and others) request or do
you think it doesn't belong there any more?
No, that's what I understood the request to be, but there was a claim
that it's in the HIG. It's not, and in fact, the behavior that the OS
specifies in the HIG for option-up and option-down is different than
what is being requested. I simply pointed out that other applications
are using option-PageUp and option-PageDown for the behavior being
requested.
REALbasic currently is conforming to the HIG for option-up and option-down.
Where did you see that ? In REALbasic 2006 ?
FYI: I just checked REALbasic 2005r4 and Option-Up Arrow moves the cursor to the
previous line (when one is available) and Option-Down Arrow moves the cursor to
the next line (when one exists).
I said that earlier, all I was asking was the previous (REALbasic 5.5.5 and
earlier) feature - using the same shortcut - but I will say "Thank you" if when
that feature comes even if the shortcut is different...
From my investigation, TextWrangler does the requested behavior, but
SubEthaEdit, Xcode, and TextEdit all do the HIG-suggested behaviors.
Option-Up or Down arrow works with Netscape 7.x
However, the best thing to do as always is to file a request in the
feedback system if you want the behavior changed. My participation in
this thread was simply to say that we *aren't* violating the HIG :)
You are welcome.
Regards,
Emile
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
