On Feb 23, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Guyren Howe wrote:
Related: I've put in a feature request that all classes should also
be considered Class Interfaces (so you could put the name of a
class in your Interfaces line for a different class, and use it
anywhere you could use the class). It would be really nice to just
proxy any class that easily. And really, a class is just another
way to define a type, so I say let's treat types the same, as much
as we can.
woqqpqgd
That is an interesting idea, so I signed on.
But it would take a lot of thought before something like this could
be implemented... it would be a nightmare (as is) to distinguish
between the true class and a class that implements it's interface
because "IsA" would evaluate true for both cases. It would also be a
bit inflexible requiring the implementing class to have all of the
methods of the base class regardless if the design warrants it.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
