I think many of us were bit by this like ago. Like the str() function, it seemed illogical and a trap to the uninitiated but RS was more interested in defending it than changing it.
Oh wait, they recently fixed str()... Maybe there's hope ;-) > I have noticed this a long time ago, but it seems logical to me. You write > "new" once, you get one instance. I admit I was a bit surprised as well at > first, but after thinking about it a little bit more it started making > sense. > > Math > > On 3/10/06, Thomas Tempelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I just found something I did not expect to work like this: >> >> dim d1, d2 as new Date >> >> I did expect that this would create TWO new Date instances, one for >> d1, and one for d2. > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
