If this is true, one should verify it using some other PPC apps.
Shouldn't this behavior appear there too?
Am 14.03.2006 um 22:35 schrieb Tom Benson:
I'd say the additional overhead is probably due to Rosetta (extra .
5 percent CPU and extra memory requirements), but am not confident.
Where should Rosetta's allocation heaps show up? Are they bundled
into the applications, or is there an actual Rosetta Process
somewhere....???
- Tom
On 15/03/2006, at 6:33 AM, Stefan Pantke wrote:
Am 14.03.2006 um 18:49 schrieb Sam Rowlands:
I have just logged the first problem I have encountered while
running RB on an Intel Mac.
Its a memory leak that happens every time a simple push button is
clicked.
http://support.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?
reportid=rxwvmgmz
Below are some observations when compared to a PPC Mac.
It takes longer to start on the MacBook Pro than it does on the
PowerBook G4 1.5ghz that I have.
On the MacBook Pro its memory consumption is 860 mbs virtual, 137
mb real
On the PowerBook G4 its memory consumption is 330 mbs virtual,
110 mb real
Might this be due to Rosetta, since the engine compiles PPC code
just in time into Intel code?
Since I don't know details, this is just a wild guess, sur
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
All questions and answers unless otherwise stated are in Relation
to Mac OS X 10.4 and later.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
