On Mar 16, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Brad Rhine wrote:
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:24 PM, John Balestrieri wrote:
Less confusing (and more accurate?) might be Rb06, Rb07, etc.
Yes, but this naming scheme is not Y3K compliant. Or year 2100, for
that matter. ;)
If I get old enough to worry about that then cool !
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
