Absolutely. Interesting that the engineer effectively says that XCode
is still not good (complete) enough yet to handle their code, and yet
there are morons berating Adobe for not having transitioned earlier!
And of course even Apple's own pages say it's not quite as simple as
a recompile. Another Jobs reality distortion field...
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate it's not easy for RS, but at the
same time the closest we've had is "by the end of the year".
As I understand it, with the rapid release model, a new version is
released every 3 months. So we have one in April, one in July, one in
October, and perhaps the January one brought forward a couple of days
so it sneaks in to December and "by the end of the year". Most people
seem not to expect UBs in the April release, but they would like to
know in which of the other 3 releases they are likely to get it.
And with Apple releasing MacIntel "earlier than
anticipated" (according to Adobe), possibly dropping non-UB software
from the web and stores, the XP fuss, and the media now even saying
PPC is obsolete, the clamour over MacIntel (no doubt because it was
on the cheap models rather than high end first) from consumers, press
and MwRb customers, I think it is time for RS to give its best guess
on which release they think they can make.
On 25 Mar 2006, at 21:25, Norman Palardy wrote:
Since RB is/was a CW project I suspect they could be running into
many of the same issues Adobe is with XCode and large projects
For another perspective on why moving to UB's can be a challenge
see http://blogs.adobe.com/scottbyer/2006/03/macintosh_and_t.html
Tony Spencer
St Rémy de Provence (13) France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tonyspencer.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
