on 31-03-2006 8:21, Maximilian Tyrtania at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I also encountered a problem like this one recently. In my case it was > Norton Antivirus inspecting a newly created file (that I created via > gettemporaryfolderitem), what in turn made f.createbinaryfile return error > 104 (file in use). > > I found the MBS-function delayMBS optimal to insert a little delay after > creating the new file, and haven't encountered any problem since. >
I'm trying to solve a similar problem reported by some users but that I can't reproduce What delay do you set? > > - Maximilian Tyrtania | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > fischerAppelt Kommunikation GmbH > Tucholskystr.18 | D-10117 Berlin | Germany > Tel. ++49-30-726146-728 > http://www.fischerappelt.de > > -- > > > Am 31.03.2006 1:11 Uhr schrieb > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" unter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Subject: Re: FolderItem weirdness >> From: Harrie Westphal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:26:39 -0600 >> >> >> On Mar 30, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Joseph J. Strout wrote: >> >>> I guess I just prefer threads for long operations. >> >> Well, in my case these are very small files being copied but on >> occasion, the file being copied will be unavailable if the program >> tries to re-access it too quickly. It doesn't happen often, but now >> and then it is a gotcha that must be coded for. > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> -- | e r | Ernesto Giannotta | n e | Musical Box - a media store _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
