Am 06.04.2006 um 01:29 schrieb dazz:
I'm not RB expert, some methods are not necessary optmised well to
run as fast as possible, but the comparaision is more important
than optimised methods. But if you find some very loosy stuff, I'll
change them of course.
- Many people said here than RB6 apps are way slower than RB5 apps.
well it's not true
I'm not RB expert either, but that really depends on what you are
doing. The basic overhead for object creation and method calls is
definitely much higher. So lets say you have scientific project which
requires you to create 10 million objects. That takes in seconds:
RB2005 0.77
RB 5.5 0.64
RB 4.5 0.22
Lets append this 10 million objects to an array:
RB2005 9.68
RB 5.5 9.60
RB 4.5 1.30
And now call a function on each object:
RB2005 2.20
RB 5.5 1.15
RB 4.5 0.73
At last calc the total:
RB2005 12.65
RB 5.5 11.39
RB 4.5 2.25
So you can see why the the transition from 4.53 (the last real Mac
product in retrospect) to RB6 has been a little painful for some of us.
Hans-Georg
p.s. Any bets that the numbers in RB2006 are lower than in RB2005?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
