Am 24.04.2006 um 00:52 schrieb Bill Cavalieri:
Don't clump all the RB users as Mac users
I don't do Windows, so I really don' care. On the plus side: If you
are discussing the Windows version you will never hear my opinions.
if your still using such an old version of the ide, then I guess I
can understand pushing a book from 1970.
I should have known that there must be some bibliophiles on this
list. So I should have checked the release date before. I guess I got
it all wrong with this book then. You probably won that argument.
But with the IDE version you are quite wrong. I routinely have
problems, where I have to create 50 to 100 millions of objects. And I
can't use RB200X for this, but 4.5 can handle this problems quite
fine. And that is not a question of opinions but you can benchmark it
by yourself. And having valid licenses for any RB version ever and
working code, tell me why I shouldn't use the right tool for the job?
In that case it's the 4 year old version.
Hans-Georg
Am 06.04.2006 um 02:47 schrieb Hans-Georg
So lets say you have scientific project which requires you to
create 10 million objects. That takes in seconds:
RB2006 7.37
RB 5.5 6.37
RB 4.5 2.20
Lets append this 10 million objects to an array:
RB2006 9.60
RB 5.5 9.60
RB 4.5 1.30
And now call a function on each object:
RB2006 2.21
RB 5.5 1.15
RB 4.5 0.73
At last calc the total:
RB2006 19,18
RB 5.5 17,12
RB 4.5 4.23
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
