On Apr 25, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
[init] isn't equivalent to new.
Init is like RB's constructor (it can be called at any time)
[alloc] is equivalent to new.
RB's new is more like [alloc[ init ]]
Yeah, I suppose so. But since +alloc creates the object and -init sets
up state, I equated +alloc to 'new' an -init to a constructor()
function. Perhaps it wasn't a good comparison.
-- Asher
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>