Charles wrote: > Unless things have changed, 'for each' does not guarantee > iteration using the array order; I consider this a shortcoming, as it > is reasonable to expect that iteration over an ordered structure > respect that order.
I agree, as do at least 28 others: <http://realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=hdcdbgfi> I bet this feedback report wins the "most-popular-feature-request-that-takes-no-work-at-all-to-implement" award. :) Feel free to sign on if you agree a dependable order would be nice. Best, - Joe -- Joe Strout -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verified Express, LLC "Making the Internet a Better Place" http://www.verex.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
