on 4/27/06 5:52 AM, Dr Gerard Hammond at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 9:45 AM +0100 27/4/06, Mark O'Neill wrote: >> Thanks to all who replied about 5.5.5 vs RB2006r2. >> >> I have a better understanding as to why some now >> stick to 5.5.5. So, my next question is... >> >> I'm nearly finished writing a cross-platform toolbar class >> for my app, which I was thinking of releasing for >> others to use and it was coded in RB2006r2. Should >> I download 5.5.5 and "fix" it so the classes work in >> 5.5.5 as well as RB2006r2 (probably the main problems >> would be default property values?) or just say on >> the download that it requires RB2006r2 or greater? > > > I am using RB55 for real projects - ie paid consulting - but using > RB2006 for my private projects. > > I suspect that RB 55 will be phased out by RB2006r3/4. ie the next > three/five months. > Anybody using RB55 by Sept/Oct will not buy your software so don't > bother with them.
I agree Gerard. Once RB can generate Universal Binaries then that version of RB will be the new minimum version for development. Chris _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
