On May 02, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Maarten de Vries wrote:
That's a good idea... But I dont get why it's not possible. I don't
see a
reason why it shouldn't be possible. There is probably a very good
one, but
I dont see it.
Maarten
Because an interface should specify functionality, not implementation
details.
A property is an implementation detail but a getter/setter is the
functionality that can then be implemented in several ways by any
class implementing the interface.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
