I already thought of that, but if the method needs to run more than once at the same time, you need to create a new subclassed thread every time you want to run the method. The reason why I don't want to wait for the method to finish is because I need to run the method a lot of times in a loop which can't take longer than one tick. If you make a new thread every time it takes longer than one tick.
Thanks, Maarten On 11/05/06, Norman Palardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 11, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Maarten de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > How can I call a method (a sub) without waiting for it to finish? > Or is this > not possible? You put the method you want to call in a thread and run that asynchronously _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
