Hi Jon,
Yes I see that, but that doesn't explain why its use should be limited to
modules. Unless I'd create an array of Structures (is that even possible?) I
likely won't be able to use it for multiuser projects. Wait, I wouldn't use
an array either. I'd create a separate Structure class and basically create
what I hoped RS would do for RB2006.
Nah, I wouldn't really do that. Too much work, and chances are my
implementation would be flawed, so it's too risky to attempt that route in
projects that could use the power of Structures. I'd most likely get by
without using Structures at all. ;-)
Ronald Vogelaar
--
http://www.rovosoft.com
On May 14, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Ronald Vogelaar wrote:
Was there a reason for not implementing the Structure more flexible?
The current structure implementation behaves most like how everything else
in REALbasic works -- strongly typed, checked at compile time.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
