On May 16, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Dan Stenning wrote:
Actually - I tracked it down - a rogue memoryBlock datatype in a
structure.
Deleted it and it went away.
You may be wondering why on earth a memoryblock was appearing in a
RB struct
( since it aint allowed ) . Its because I am writing an app which
converts
C++ headers ( including struct, typedef and union info ) into
REALbasic
projects. It was replacing pointers with memoryblocks. This works
for RB
methods but obviously not structs.
Ah, please do file a report with a project though. We do have some
checks in there, but for some reason it wasn't working. It would be
nice to fix this failed assertion.
I've already posted a feedback request on the RB site to ask for
some new
Integer datatype names that can indicate where integer Int32 etc
values are
actually pointers.
Such as Ptr? (Which already works for this exact reason)
HTH,
Jon
--
Jonathan Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REAL Software, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
