"FOR SURE" it wont at the moment That's why I added it as a feature request.
Al the other things around the "assigns" keyword are useful yes. But im asking the indexing concept to be enhanced specifically so we can use for each. This requires for RS to emulate complete array behaviour ( like C# does. ) . In essence I want an RB class or computed property to be viewed form the outside world completely like an array. I guess some form of C++ "template" language concept in RB would help. Some way of universalising the iterator concepts so we can use for each. I just happen to really lurve FOR EACH ! Dan On 17/5/06 15:42, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One major benefit of this would be to be able to use the FOR EACH >> construct >> on these methods. That would give us the control and versatility >> of using >> methods and our own code to govern access to lists, arrays etc. >> while still >> retaining the power and readability of using FOR EACH as oppoosed >> to indexes >> and ubound type calls. > > Not sure that for each will work even if you can do this _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
