Im with you on that - I don't need the extra [] indexing coding style, just what we talked about before.
What I do think is desirable is some form of genericity like C++ templates ( but please - without the so ugly syntax of C++ ) . Such a scheme would also help gie you all the iterator stuff you mentioned. I would prefer the C++ template approach where each different template specialisation is internally built as a separate class. This is for performance reasons. The C# generics dynamic approach has more overhead and performance issues. Not sure what java has as far as this is concerned. On 17/5/06 18:30, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sure. That would be perfect. As long as the final iterator scheme >> allows [] >> style indexing too like the C++ STL :) > > RB isn't C++ and it's been well documented in the archives that the > folks at REAL are seriously opposed to making it that way > Java style is more like _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
