I didn't think about that. I was mislead a bit by the error
message, which didn't state that the typecast expected an integer
and got a double; it stated that a class was expected for the
typecast. For the sake of others who might run into this at some
time, could the error message be made more informative?
Yeah, it does sound like an unhelpful error message. It's probably
the same error message we used since before the typecasting operator
was extended to support enumerations. Mind filing a bug report
about it?
Consider it done!
BTW, I'd like to continue the discussion we've been having on Aaron's
site about symbols in the frameworks. I'll email you.
Thanks for all of your hard work on the RB compiler!
-Scott
Scott B. Steinman, O.D., Ph.D., F.A.A.O.
Professor, Southern College of Optometry
Author, "Visual Programming with Prograph CPX", Manning/Prentice-
Hall, 1995 (www.manning.com/steinman).
Author, "Foundations of Binocular Vision", McGraw-Hill, 2000
(books.mcgraw-hill.com/cgi-bin/pbg/0838526705.html)
1245 Madison Avenue
Memphis, TN 38104-2222
steinman at sco.edu
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
in practice, there is." - Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut
Actual post to the Web: "But like I said there to dumb to know any
better."
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
