...the point of this is to allow the CompareTo method to declare what type (or types) it can compare itself to...
This seems like a specific instance of a more general problem. For instance, I often find myself writing classes that are lists of various things. With judicious naming, the only difference between the various list classes is the type of thing being listed. I'd like to be able to create a "template" class, method, or module that centralizes all the repetitive logic, and just leaves the type unspecified. (Now is the time for you to invoke your favorite "RB is not C++ !!!" macro.) lj _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
