On Jul 06, 2006, at 3:41 PM, David Glass wrote:
Uhhhmmm...yes?
I was simply noting a possible breakdown in communication.
When a feature is *specifically* named as not going into a release,
and that same feature is *specifically* named as being in the
release, it would appear there is a breakdown.
I'd agree.
But if there are things on any vendors feature list that, once you
try and use them, don't work how much of a feature is that ?
It's like any vendor saying "We support X but it's full of bugs"
It's not really useful.
That's all I meant.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
