I've been away from writing to the lists for a while- but I just thought I'd chime in here. I think REALbasic is at the cusp of great things. Why?

RS has faced many difficult transitions that involve total overhauls to significant pieces of code lately. Some of which they had control over, some that they did not. As any of us in the software world know, these sorts of overhauls can be the enemy to the eventual goal of consistency and stability. These include:

-OS 9 to OS X
-Old compiler to new compiler
-Linux framework
-IDE written in CodeWarrior to IDE written in RB
-All of framework written in CodeWarrior to more in RB
-IDE written in RB 5.x to IDE written in RB200x
-PowerPC only to Universal binaries
-Carbon to Cocoa framework
etc, etc.

A lot of Other development environments have made similar transitions, but they have had more resources (Microsoft / Metrowerks / Apple) and they have thrown away more backwards compatibility and/or just support one platform. Before someone brings up Revolution- I went down that road one day before realizing that system had far more language, gui control, and other issues that were harder for me to workaround than RB had.

My point is simply this. I think that RB is on the right track. Once the transition to Universal Binaries is done, and more of RB gets written with the current version of RB, I actually believe we will start to see the 200x series truly mature.

I for one am grateful that RS has taken an aggressive approach to platform support (entering the Linux market, which with previous tools would have cost too much, helped me out quite a bit). I *do* think perhaps they've leaned a bit too far on functionality rather than bug fixes. But in my opinion, it isn't nearly as far off the deep end as a lot of people think... Just my two cents.

--Travis
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to