Am 24.07.2006 um 01:54 schrieb Seth Willits:
On Jul 23, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Stefan wrote:
I prepared a small application, which manages personal finance:
Well, I'll ignore that this is pretty far on the edge of what's on
topic and just reply. :)
Too bad, then I won't earn 0 USD (it's freeware)
Although this little app is an UB version written in CoCoa
Cocoa
Well, although there is a syntactic difference, I'm pretty
sure, that you discovered my intended semantics ;-)
I'd be too happy, if we would see some day a DB-based RAD solution
in RB,
which mimics (parts of) CoreData some way.
I know, that I could use RB's bindings, but the last time I gave
it a try,
I probably discovered problems. Might be solved today.
Especially CoreData's handling of master-detail views is really nice.
Note, that CoCoaCash not even required a single line of code.
Well, Core Data and Cocoa Bindings and two separate things.
You missed name-value-binding, which is very important here...
They don't need each other at all. Cocoa Bindings are lightyears
ahead of what REALbasic calls bindings. REALbasic's seem to have
just been hobbling along since 1.0 or whenever they came about,
almost entirely ignored. It was neat in 1996, but today they're
just weak.
My point. Therefore, I implemented my own RB framework - which I
feel is a bit richer ;-)
Anyway, kudos. Don't use Cocoa too much, or you'll switch over like
me. :)
I might switch back ;-)
CU,
s
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
