I agree with Joe. Developing a community RBScript editor wouldn't be that difficult (some person/company already has one out there somewhere), ditto for documentation, but everytime I personally consider starting such a project, I am discouraged by the likely futility of it all, given the crashing bugs, the general and completely baffling neglect on the part of REAL, and (which follows) the absence of things like PartialRun and decent threading/yielding behavior that would be needed in most (albeit not all) applications of RBScript that I've ever had in mind.
My understanding was that Swordfish (I just woke up, so it's possible that this whole "Swordfish" thing is just a remnant of something I was dreaming about -- if so, if "Swordfish" is just a figment of my imagination, then disregard the following) was going to use RBScript. I don't see how REAL could ever have a web server framework based on RBScript with crashing bugs, poor threading/yielding, etc., so I had hoped we would be seeing major progress (or at least *some* progress) on the RBScript front, but that hasn't happened. As I said, it's baffling... -Walter On 7/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To me, these bugs are far more important than feature requests such as separate RBScript documentation and a custom editor, which we could provide ourselves with a bit of effort. But the crashing/freezing bugs in RBScript, we can't do anything about. I would be quite happy if just those were fixed -- and from what I've heard on this list, so would many others.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
