right here:
http://support.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?
reportid=kcgycxwe
was just waiting for at least one person to tell me im not crazy :)
mike
--
Mike Woodworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Phil M wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Mike Woodworth wrote:
i was tracking down a bug in a chunk of declares the other day,
when i found something which took me awhile to understand - i had
written a function to convert rb integers to fixed datatype. it
read like this:
function int2fixed (i as integer) as integer
return i * &hFFFF
end
simple... easy to read... gave the wrong answers?? it appears &h
is returning a double, causing my int to be multiplied in double
space leading to rounding errors. when i switched it to use
bitshiftleft the problems went away.
my question to the list is - now that we have int64, can anyone
conceive of a reason we would want &h to return a double? to the
best of my knowledge &h will always be *trying* to represent an
integer value, correct? is it time to file a feature request? or
is there still some logic to this choice?
Very good point. Where is the feedback ID?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
