On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Theodore H. Smith wrote:

3) More people have stopped ranting and focussed on other ways of
expressing their personal opinions.

Or maybe it's cyclical? I'd wait 1 year before believing that :)

Or RS upsets the apple cart with major modifications to the IDE again. :)

Now that I know to use RB within it's limits, everything is fine.

That was always one of the major problems. This being the expectations of new users being higher that the reality of RB and why it was developed in the first place.

For me, getting involved in programming on the Mac in 1995 meant buying something like Code Warrior and learning C or Pascal. The price was high, the complexity intimidating and the learning curve too steep for me. When REALbasic came out, I jumped on the bandwagon and found I could make simple apps in a very short time. I never expected to create the next "World's Greatest App." for the Mac so it fit like a glove.

Since that time, RB has grown so much I honestly can't keep up with many of the features it now has.

I would consider the volume now more in line with what it was before
5.0, after 5.5.5 and before 2005r1.

One last comment. RB users are getting used to RB and are having
fewer difficulties.

Probably.

I remember a time when every other post was about encodings. It was encoding madness for a while.

I guess these days the understanding on encodings has sort of seeped in through the community. Or perhaps people are just getting comfortable with utf-8... (RB's new default encoding).

Sometimes there is just simple resistance to any change that requires learning new concepts.

Many of the changes that have happened in RB are simply because the various OSes have been changing and what was the standard yesterday no longer exists.

Regards to all,

Terry

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to