Reply to Mars Saxman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06-08-22 09:26:
> > Is there some way I can get RB to recognize that the expected
> > return type? Is
> > there some way I can get this to work?
>
> No. Overloading is based only on parameters, not on return values.
I suppose I should add this as a feature suggestion but before doing that, is it
technically possible to add overloading/method identification based on the full
signature in RB?
jem
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
