Better for its purpose yes (REALbasic code), but for Text ?? I doubt it
would be better for text it probably does no wrapping and things like
that. (After all REALbasic code does not need such)
Björn
Monad wrote:
Hello fellow list members,
Someone told me that RB (at least its IDE) is written with RB. Looking at the
IDE, I must conclude that it is not using the standard Editfield control. I
think it is probably based on a Canvas.
Can someone tell me why that Editfield is not available to us developers as a
standard control? It seems to be a much better Editfield than the one we're
being offered.
Thank you - bye,
μονάδα
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rovosoft.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
