Yep......
Give me the lot...... Why not ?? :) Anything but assembler, that's what I say, C can keep assembler, do any stuff requiring assember in C/C++ plugins. The rest I'd much rather do all in RB. Any reason to stay away from C is a good thing imo. RB is already RAD to some extent, but in the IT arena - not to the productivity level of say PowerBuilder. For applications not involving databases - yes - its RAD enough ( well always room for improvement in that area - how long is a piece of string ? ) . On 2/9/06 17:27, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In order to entice developers away from those other languages REAL > has to have comparable language features and then something extra. > I'd say RAD is the "extra". But additional language features may be > needed as well. > > Fortran offers numerical libraries > Java has portability, class introspection and serialization and > several other items > C++ has the ability to interface to just about anything you can throw > at it, inline code, etc _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
