On Sep 8, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Seth Willits wrote:
There's some kind of misunderstanding here. I don't understand how this fits to what you originally said. You said "The new format lends itself well to rapid and continuing changes as opposed to the old format." I interpreted that as you saying that because the OLR is in HTML it's easier for RS to create new and modify the existing pages and redistribute it.
You do have me at a disadvantage here as you have been involved in its conception and understand the format of the original.
The difference is that I can now edit it, should I ever want to, whereas I couldn't before. Therefore, it should also be easy for RS to do the same.
All I was saying is that it took a turn for the worse in the Syntax areas than it was before. There were a few that made more sense and were better detailed than earlier but some errors were also introduced in the last 2 versions (r3 and r4 alphas).
I really do like the better linking to the classes themselves when getting there was by a search.
Terry _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
