On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Frank Condello wrote:
On 14-Sep-06, at 4:29 PM, Mars Saxman wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:49 PM, Frank Condello wrote:
When you need speed it looks more like:
m.Pointer( m.kStride * 3 ) = 1.0 // No function calls!
Not pretty, but it's much faster (though sadly still not as fast
as C code)
I'll bet it's about as fast as C code would be if you compiled it
with a non-optimizing compiler.
OK, I'll reword that bit: ...not as fast as C code compiled with an
optimizing compiler... ;)
if only we could loose that one remaining caveat. how many quick
fixes would RS need us to pool to get that for r5?
mike
--
Mike Woodworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
