> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ronald Vogelaar > Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 8:00 AM > To: REALbasic NUG > Subject: Re: Alternative scripting engines > > I think the parser demo I put out a few weeks ago would be > among the fastest alternative solutions, but still, don't do > anything else but strings, and only then if you need to do > stuff you can't in RBScript or it'd quickly become an > excercise in futility.
I was thinking to a stack based script (like Postscript, just to make an example), and to make some classes to interact with the script from a REALbasic program. I know it would be slower than RbScript, but it would not have the same limits / bugs it has; and then it could have a stronger bond to REALbasic programs. I wonder why nobody says that the RbScript engine makes your program 1 Megabytes larger. -- ~Alberto Paderno _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
