On 12/10/06 22:18, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Oct 12, 2006, at 19:01 UTC, Daniel Stenning wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I wanted to use dictionaries much more in my current
>> project, but
>>> avoid them mostly, simply because the current implementation is so
>>> unfriendly when debugging. By this I mean when one is using
>> dictionaries to
>>> store keyed collections of object instances. One cannot view/examine
>> the
>>> list of objects in the way one can view and inspect arrays of object
>>> subclass instances in the debugger pane. I submitted an FR a while
>> back for
>>> this.
>>
>> What do you mean? You just click on "Contents" and it shows you all
>> the key/value pairs in the dictionary. What more is it you're asking
>> for?
>
> Try a dictionary of dictionaries :(
Or a dictionary of Objects or object subclasses
( unless they have improved since I last looked at using one )
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
>
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
