More accurately, it's 20.6% faster.
Ronald Vogelaar
http://www.rovosoft.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Vogelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "REALbasic NUG" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:40 AM
Subject: Faster than i=i+1
Funny thing... while breaking my head over a counter incrementer that
wouldn't suffer from overhead of a function call, while still being faster
than peforming i=i+1, I found out that using
i = i - - 1
is actually about 10% faster (on Windows) than
i = i + 1
Is that weird or what?
Ronald Vogelaar
http://www.rovosoft.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
__________ NOD32 1.1801 (20061012) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
