On 22-Nov-06, at 3:12 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
On Nov 22, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Mars Saxman wrote:
On Nov 22, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Brendan Murphy wrote:
we will never get a proper assert implementation simply because
they wish to enforce a particular development style upon us for
our own good.
This discussion is a pretty good demonstration of the idea that
different developers, and even different projects, need an assert
system to do different things. I suspect that a one-size-fits-all
assert system built into the RB framework would cause more
problems than it would solve.
Agreed
The meta information request would make it easier for us to tailor
to our needs though
That, plus generic macros should cover just about all these
complaints. This macro request has the right idea: <http://
www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=aiwsbqyw>
though I don't think the suggested in-line syntax is needed at all.
Frank.
<http://developer.chaoticbox.com/>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
