Well, I'm sorry about my previous answer. Then, a feature request would be a thing to do? Telling RS that they should check if the temp folder is writeable (now that RB is made using RB, we all know they can check that).
No, as /tmp is always writable (or a lot of things won't work). It's to test if you can create and run an _executable_ from /tmp. Craig Thanks for your explanation. Le 12 déc. 06 à 13:54 Soir, Mathieu Langlois a écrit: > I think he means that RB-compiled apps write files (like framework or > plugin objects) to the /tmp regardless of the code, which doesn't > surprise me, they seem to make heavy use of that directory. Of course > they assume that the /tmp is always available, which normally it is, > but obviously there are exceptions, like this case. > > On 12/12/06, Arnaud Nicolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you use something else than the TemporaryFolder and >> GetTemporaryFolderItem functions, you will certainly be able to write >> files elsewhere. For example, in an invisible folder that you create >> yourself which serves as your own temp folder (you clean it after you >> use it). _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
