Jonathan Johnson wrote:
The time we switched keyboard shortcuts was when we redesigned the
UI completely. Pretty much all muscle memory was lost at that
point.

In terms of basic menu and key layout, the new UI isn't that far
from the old UI, so that is not a valid point in the example I
gave since the debugger keys should of had priority since they are
used all the time. In the new UI you recently changed the the keys
for the find functionality. I can see why you did it, but it
definitely violated the "muscle memory" principle since I had to
retrain myself to learn the new combination. So the "muscle
memory" principle is a weak argument and that is what I am trying
to say.

If we were to change the keyboard shortcuts right now, it would be
done for a completely arbitrary reason, would go against the HIG,
and would serve to confuse as many, if not more, people than it
would help.

I am not advocating that Andy's request is valid or invalid, but
that consideration of the determination of the fate of the request
not be on an arbitrary basis. In Andy's example, solid reasoning
for not changing it would be the HIG argument which you presented.
But think what happens when a feature request is rejected with a
weak argument like the muscle memory one, it only serves to
irritate the customer and is that what you want? Andy was
irritated and his response was to bring it up on the NUG.

Perhaps you guys are missing an opportunity to change the UI for
the better based on weak reasoning. Probably every one here has
had a feature request rejected for stupid reasons. Sometimes it
can be like pulling teeth when it comes to feedback reports when
you read some of the evaluations presented in them by the RS team.
Nobody is perfect, so there will be friction when weak arguments
are presented, but I find it happens more than I would like it
too. So my suggestion to you RS is to put a little more effort
into the evaluations of feedback reports. We as customers should
also make our feedback reports well thought out with solid
reasoning behind our requests (and be a little more thick skinned
when they are rejected).

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to